MOVIES

Box Office Bombs You Have To Watch On Netflix Right Now

Yes, 2012’s “Total Recall” is widely considered one of the worst, most toothless and thematically traitorous remakes ever made. And, no, it’s nowhere near as good as Paul Verhoeven’s original film. But it’s still one of the most fascinating movies you’ll find on Netflix.

For fans of the 1990 “Total Recall,” the 2012 version is an endlessly arresting case study in Hollywood’s mentality regarding reboots-slash-remakes in the early 2010s. These days, audiences are fed an endless slew of so-called “soft reboots” — stories meant to appeal to longtime fans of a franchise while being 100% accessible to new audiences. In 2012, however, Hollywood would seemingly start production on a remake by completely throwing out everything but the logline — then brainstorming how they could twist that as well. The film also shows off a rare side of Colin Farrell, as Hollywood tried — as they have a surprising amount of times — to sell the charming, dramatic powerhouse as a plug-n-play action star.

Despite 2012 being the 7th highest-grossing year for the U.S. box office, it had some legendary bombs. “Total Recall” — with its $198 million haul against a $125 million budget — didn’t even crack the year’s 10 biggest failures, edged out by duds like “Dredd,” “Cloud Atlas,” and infamously “John Carter.”

Source link

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button

SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS