MOVIES

Jane Fonda’s Barbarella Nude Scene Had To Be Reshot For A Wild Reason

During her 2023 Cannes Film Festival appearance, Jane Fonda shared that she wasn’t at all a fan of “Barbarella” during the filming process. “I didn’t like it at all when I was making it,” she said bluntly. But with over five decades between her and that experience, she looks at it much differently all these years later. “Now when I see it, I think it’s fun,” she admitted. Fonda shared similar feelings on the feature back in 2005 to CBS News, admitting that after ages of not being able to look at “Barbarella,” she can now get a good laugh out of it and appreciate its charm.

At first glance, it may seem like Fonda is totally content with “Barbarella” and its legacy, despite the discomfort that came with making it. In reality, she still holds some frustrated feelings about it. It has come to light that a new “Barbarella” film is in the works with Sydney Sweeney set to star, but Fonda has no desire to think about it let alone be involved. The reason? The squandered potential of the original. “I worry about what it’s going to be. I had an idea of how to do it that [original producer] Dino De Laurentiis, when he was still alive, wouldn’t listen to. But it could have been a truly feminist movie,” she told The Hollywood Reporter.

Barbarella is far from a mainstream pop culture icon in the modern era, but perhaps that will change with the Sydney Sweeney-led reboot movie. Hopefully, she has a better time making the film than Jane Fonda did decades ago, and the production meets its fullest potential.

Source link

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button

SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS SEO LINKS