MOVIES

Actors Who Have The Longest Streak Of Box Office Bombs

Clive Owen worked for a few years before gaining international attention in 1998’s “Croupier.” After that, he appeared in several high-profile movies, including “The Bourne Identity,” “King Arthur,” and “Sin City.” Over the years, Owen worked on several movies that were critically acclaimed but failed to make enough money at the box office to become profitable, and the list is long.

Owen’s longest streak of box office bombs is still ongoing at 23 movies long, making him the A-lister with the second-longest streak. Interestingly, this kicked off with the highly lauded “Children of Men,” which didn’t make as much as its production budget. His follow-up, “Shoot ‘Em Up,” was a box office disappointment, as was “Elizabeth: The Golden Age.” Alongside small projects that failed to make money, like 2008’s “Savage Grace,” 2009’s “The Boys Are Back,” and 2011’s “Trust,” his big-budget films disappointed as well.

“Killer Elite,” with Robert de Niro and Jason Statham, yielded $65.4 million internationally on a budget of $70 million. The “Sin City” sequel, “A Dame to Kill For,” severely underperformed, making only $40.6 million on a budget of $65 million. Owen also starred in “Valerian and the City of a Thousand Planets,” which made over $215 million but missed its break-even goal due to its $180 million budget. His last high-profile release was “Gemini Man” starring Will Smith, which grossed a disappointing $166.5 million on a budget of $140 million. The actor hasn’t made a profitable film since 2006’s “Inside Man.”

Source link

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button

GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX GOOGLE INDEX