MOVIES

Tom Ellis Would Return As Lucifer On One Condition

While “Lucifer” Season 7 may be an altogether unlikely possibility, Tom Ellis’ potential film isn’t the first proposal for a “Lucifer” sequel. About a year after “Lucifer” Season 6 first hit Netflix, Screen Rant interviewed co-showrunners Joe Henderson and Ildy Modrovich. Henderson in particular shared that he would like to work on “Lucifer” again at some point in the future. “I think hopefully at some point, we can find a way to come back, or at least revisit or do something,” he said. “It was such a great time, it’s such a great experience, and we love these people, so never say never.”

Modrovich then chimed in to pitch a “Lucifer” musical on Broadway, while Henderson floated the idea of an animated “Lucifer” series. While these comments may not be completely serious, the series’ former showrunners have, at least, shown interest both in more “Lucifer” and a revival taking a form other than a live-action TV series. It’s not a huge leap to suggest that if they’re thinking of a musical or an animated sequel, a conventional movie like Ellis suggests isn’t out of the question. Of course, getting a movie off the ground requires much more than interest, but at the very least, it’s not just Ellis who’s open to the notion of more “Lucifer.”

Source link

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button

GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG GONGSENG